Microsoft Bing VS admins

Guys, what do you think, bad programming or bad administration?

IWSS Security Event (argon)
InterScan Web Security detected the following in HTTP traffic:

Item: http://www.bing.com/search?q=fromzerotoseo&go=&form=QBLH
Action: deleted
Reason: Violation of a compressed file restriction

— File: http://www.bing.com/searc, security warning: Corrupted_Zip_file
The uncleanable file is deleted.

12 thoughts on “Microsoft Bing VS admins”

  1. Hi guys,

    I told to our admins to add bing.com to white list, but they still didn’t give a shit about that! It Is not problem of the Microsoft that our admins cant move their stinky asses.

    I think that it is only solution to add bing to white list. Who knows how bing.com compresses the data… Only that I can see is:
    Host

    http://www.bing.com

    User-Agent

    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 FirePHP
    /0.3

    Accept

    text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8

    Accept-Language

    en-us,en;q=0.7,ru;q=0.3

    Accept-Encoding

    gzip,deflate

    Accept-Charset

    UTF-8,*

    They use gzip and delfate, all is standart…

    May be IWSS is fucked up!?

  2. Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results.

  3. i have been using the BING search engine for a couple of weeks. it seems to be as good as Google but for some reason i would still want to stick with Google search engine.

  4. i am using both Bing and Google and i think both search engines give relevant search results. i would still prefer Google though, because it gives a little bit more relevant search results than Bing.

Comments are closed.